As the global energy structure transitions toward decarbonization, hydrogen energy, as a clean secondary energy carrier, has attracted significant attention. Electrolytic water splitting stands as the core pathway for green hydrogen production. Current mainstream electrolysis technologies include Solid Oxide Electrolysis (SOEC), Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis (PEM), Alkaline Water Electrolysis (AWE), and Anion Exchange Membrane Electrolysis (AEM).  

 I. SOEC: Requires Heat Sources

SOEC technology employs solid oxides as the electrolyte to achieve water splitting through oxygen ion (O^2-) or proton (H⁺) conduction. Based on the ion transport mechanism, it is categorized into two types: oxygen-ion conducting and proton-conducting.

The advantages of SOEC technology lie in its high efficiency and low energy consumption, with its system-level energy efficiency exceeding that of AWE by over 30%. Additionally, SOEC technology features reversible operation and waste heat recovery capabilities. However, the equipment for SOEC technology requires customized development, incurring higher fixed capital investment, and exhibit increased system complexity due to the need for high-temperature heat sources. These constraints limit their application scenarios, making them more suitable for deployment in regions with abundant thermal energy resources or substantial waste heat, such as steel plants, chemical synthesis facilities, or nuclear power plants.

 II. PEM: High Performance, High Cost  

PEM technology utilizes perfluorosulfonic acid membranes as electrolytes, with noble metal catalysts (IrO₂ anode, Pt/C cathode) and titanium-based bipolar plates. The technical advantages of SOEC encompass:

1.Ultra-high current density: Compact design with current density 4-5 times higher than AWE.  

2.Rapid dynamic response: Millisecond-level adaptability to power fluctuations, ideal for off-grid renewable energy scenarios.  

3.High gas purity: Membrane electrodes block hydrogen-oxygen crossover (<1% hydrogen crossover), enhancing safety.  

The key challenges of PEM technology lie in its high costs, primarily attributed to critical materials such as PEMs, catalysts and bipolar plates. Currently, the price of PEM electrolyzers is approximately 3-5 times higher than that of AWE.

 III. AWE: The mainstay of large-scale hydrogen production  

AWE technology uses KOH solution as the electrolyte and composite diaphragms to separate electrodes. It is the most mature electrolysis technology. AWE’s core competitive strengths stems from:

1.Cost advantage: Non-precious metal electrodes (Ni-based catalysts) and carbon steel bipolar plates reduce system costs to 3,000-5,000 yuan/kW.  

2.High single-stack capacity: Exceeds 5,000 Nm³/h.  

3.Proven process maturity: With technological roots dating back to the 1950s-1960s, AWE exhibits well-established technological frameworks, extensive industrialization experience, and high operational reliability of equipment.

However, AWE technology also presents limitations, including large system footprint, low material costs but unsuitability for precisely controlled production, relatively higher energy consumption, and limited dynamic response capability to variable power inputs. Nevertheless, driven by its low capital expenditure and high hydrogen output capacity , AWE remains the mainstream technology for green hydrogen production in the next decade.  

 IV. AEM: High Potential  

AEM, a relatively nascent technology, utilizes an anion exchange membrane as the electrolyte, combining the merits of both AWE and PEM technologies. It exhibits high dynamic response capability and relatively lower costs while maintaining competitive efficiency. Key technical characteristics are as follows:

1. Innovative structure: Anion-conducting membranes shorten ion transport paths, reducing resistance.

2. Material optimization: Eliminates Ir-based anodes, non-precious metal catalysts possible for cathodes.  

3. Cost potential: System cost projected to be 40%-60% lower than PEM.  

However, AEM technology still faces critical challenges, notably poor chemical stability and insufficient mechanical durability of the membranes, which currently necessitate replacement every 1-2 years of operation. If breakthroughs in membrane technology can be achieved, AEM electrolysis is poised to secure a significant market position in the future hydrogen economy.

V. Innovation in Hydrogen Production: Xander Hydrogen’s Modular high-efficiency energy-saving electrolyzer

Addressing the critical pain points in the AWE industry, Xander Hydrogen adopts a forward-thinking, user-centric R&D strategy, pioneering modular, standardized, and scalable electrolyzer manufacturing with cost-effective assembly processes.This approach addresses the issue of traditional electrolyzers being unable to rapidly scale up production capacity as the production scale expands. It provides customers with efficient and reliable integrated solutions for green hydrogen production.

Key Advantages are as follows:

1. Modular design: Facilitates easy parallel or series connection to meet different production scale requirements.  

2. High consistency and rapid delivery: Automated production and standardized assembly.Delivery cycle reduced from one month to 72 hours.  

3. Lightweight structure: The cell frame uses a non-metallic structure, making it easy to handle and install.  

4. Easy maintenance: Faulty modules can be quickly pulled out and replaced, reducing maintenance costs (by 60%), downtime, and production losses.

5. Wide power regulation: The load range of 1,000 Nm³/h electrolyzers

can be adjusted from 10% to 120%, flexibly matching the input off luctuating energy sources. 

6. Low cost: High material utilization rate, with significant cost reduction throughout the entire lifecycle from purchase to maintenance.  

7. Hydrogen production operating pressure: 1.6 MPa.  

Furthermore, through breakthrough structural designs, Xander Hydrogen’s electrolyzers not only achieve enhanced efficiency in alkaline hydrogen production and automated manufacturing processes but also establish a rapid technological iteration pathway toward high-potential AEM electrolyzers. This strategic advancement positions the company to leverage a technology generation gap advantage, preparing it for the anticipated surge in the future AEM market.